| In water resuscitation is providing a victim air while he is being brought to shore, or a boat. It can only be rendered on the surface, by mouth-to-mouth or mouth-to-snorkel. The question on in water resuscitation is if it really saves a victim our adds to his problem. Brain death starts to occur in about three minutes after the victim stops breathing. In water resuscitation is thought to get oxygen to the brain during the tow to boat or shore. This is based upon the assumption that respiratory arrest is the victim's only problem, the heart is still beating and the rescuer performs the technique right. If the victim is in cardiac arrest, then all in water respirations are going to do is slow down starting definitive therapy. Another concern is if the victim can be gotten out of the water in less than three minutes, but the rescuer stops to try to establish in water respirations and lengthens the towing time to five minutes, without circulation, then irreversible brain damage may have all ready occurred. |
| Physiological factors also play in water resuscitation. Most near drowning victims have a blocked airway due to laryngospasm, once artificial respirations start the first reaction of the victim may be to throw up. In the water it is hard to clear or even see the airway and vomitus and water may be forced into the lungs by the rescuer. When the bobbing of the victim and rescuer is added to water action, the rescuer might be forcing aspiration with every breath. |
| Field experiments of trying to tow a resuscitation dummy, and keep water out of the lungs, while preforming in water respirations show it is almost impossible. Time trials of towing and performing good respiration versus towing and starting resuscitation on land or boat show that it takes almost twice as long to get the victim to shore while attempting in water resuscitation. The question is, does the extra time help or hinder the victim? |
| The question of whether to attempt in water resuscitation or not is based on judgement. It can be assumed that respiratory arrest preceded cardiac arrest in the drowning victim, thus clearing the airway may be all that is needed to start spontaneous respirations. However not all victims encountered are going be classic near drowning victims, and if a MI is the root cause of the near drowning delaying CPR may be detrimental. Judgement must used as to when to start respirations or not, based on distance to shore or boat and the nature of the cause. In all cases always check and clear the airway on every victim found in the water, this may restart breathing. Keep in mind that respiration without circulation is a waste of time and effort. |
| Never attempt to give air to a non-breathing person underwater, this could result in the victim's condition being aggravated, by forcing water into the lungs, or stomach. It also endangers the victim and the rescuer to over pressure injury, and greatly slows ascent. That is not to say that there are no methods for underwater resuscitation. Some people advocate it for situations when free ascent to the surface is denied, as in caves, wrecks, and under ice, but it is our opinion the danger to self, and victim is far too great a risk. Use your time to get the victim to the surface and shore where oxygen and definitive therapy can begin. |
| A SCUBA regulator is not a ventilator. Do not use it as a demand valve, or IPPD. If used as one, there is no guarantee air will enter the lungs. Air escapes out the exhalation ports. If you fully block the ports, a full pressure up to 180 psi over ambient may by infused into the diver's lungs. Some regulators may over pressure a victim even with the ports open causing lung rupture. It is not recommended that a SCUBA regulator by used to ventilate a victim. There is a method of delivering air to a non-breathing victim underwater with the second stage, but now more research needs to be done in the effects of this technique. |
In water CPR has been suggested, but it is best to wait until in shore or on a boat. |
| The technique of in water respiration is covered here, as to its useability, it is up to the judgement of the rescuer. Every rescue team should train in the technique and do time trials as well as using resuscitation dummies that allow for measurement of water in the lungs. Learn when and when not to use it. |
| Artificial respiration may need to given while bringing a victim to shore and this is done via mouth-to mouth, or mouth - to - snorkel. Most snorkels work well, but some are too rigid, and some maybe to long. Snorkels with a purge valve require that you block the valve to prevent air from escaping. Mouth-to-snorkel is a resuscitation technique that can be very useful in rough water, or in rivers. |
| The question of which method is better often comes up, both work fine in theory. However mouth-to-mouth is harder to maintain. Air can be given by mouth-to-snorkel lower in the water, making towing easier. With mouth-to-snorkel the rescuer, and the victim are more horizonal in the water reducing drag, and your heads do not need to be as close, providing better vision of your line of travel, and more buoyancy can be used. Mouth-to-snorkel does require more time to initiate, good dexterity (which decreases with the temperature) and training. Also it is not easy to detect vomit. Rescue teams should train on both methods because different situations may require one over the other. Which method to use is left to the individual rescuer, he should base his discussion on weighing all the factors and amount of training in each. |
When Administering In Water
Resuscitation:
|
IN WATER MOUTH-TO-MOUTH
|
MOUTH-TO-SNORKEL
|
National Association of Rescue Divers
P.O. Box 590474, Houston, Texas 77259-0474
Site Made & Maintained by: RescueDiver.org
Any Inquires Should Be Made To: WEBMASTER@RescueDiver.org
Copyright 2006 National Association of Rescue Divers ©